Corporate and commercial firms
Transactional practices where the real workload is documents, versions and approvals rather than hearings — and where a client's finance department will reject an invoice that is not properly structured.
One system for a practice that runs in two languages, across two legal traditions, for clients who expect to see their matter status without asking for it.
The defining feature of UAE legal practice is that a single firm often works across two different legal systems at once. Onshore matters run through the federal and emirate-level courts in Arabic under a civil-law framework. DIFC and ADGM matters run in English under common-law rules with their own courts and their own procedure. A firm doing both needs a case record that does not assume one of them is the exception.
That duality runs straight into the document layer. The same transaction may produce an Arabic contract, an English translation, a bilingual annex and correspondence in both — with the version that was actually signed being the one nobody can find. Version control and permissions on documents are not administrative niceties here; they are the difference between advising on the right draft and the wrong one.
Client expectations are also set by a different benchmark. Corporate clients in the UAE are used to a self-service portal from their bank, their auditor and their government services, and they extend that expectation to their lawyers. A client who can open a portal, see the current status of their matter, download the filed document and pay the invoice is a client who does not generate three status emails a week.
Firms here also tend to be more international in composition than the region's average — a mix of Emirati, Arab and expatriate lawyers, with turnover. That makes institutional memory fragile. When advice, notes and documents live on the matter rather than in an individual's inbox, an associate leaving is an inconvenience rather than a loss.
Transactional practices where the real workload is documents, versions and approvals rather than hearings — and where a client's finance department will reject an invoice that is not properly structured.
Firms running onshore court matters alongside DIFC, ADGM or arbitral proceedings, where procedural deadlines come from several sources and none of them forgive a miss.
Long-running matters with heavy documentation, multiple counterparties and disbursements that accumulate over months before anyone reconciles them.
Corporate legal teams managing internal matters, external counsel spend and contract records, who need the same audit trail a firm needs but report to a CFO rather than a client.
Plans start at $49 per month for a solo practice and $149 per month for the Professional plan, which adds the AI assistant, analytics and up to five team members. Enterprise, at $399 per month, covers unlimited seats, custom integrations and an on-premise option for firms with data-residency requirements. All plans start with a 14-day free trial.
Pricing →Built around how Egyptian offices actually work: sessions that adjourn, files that live in three places at once, and clients who call to ask what happened at the hearing.
Arabic-first records, invoicing that matches what the tax authority expects, and a matter file that holds up when the practice doubles in size.
The complete guide: what these systems do, how to evaluate one honestly, what adoption really costs, and the three articles that go deeper on each part.
Most firms evaluate on features and regret it. The questions that actually predict whether a system will still be in use in six months are different ones.
The firms that fail at going paperless all fail the same way: they scan everything first. Here is the order that works instead.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.
Start Your Free Trial